Adult Script Pro Community Forums

Really, you need to understand. THis is not Nuevolab forum, not Nueolab support.
Nuevolab is 3rd party, independent developer and provides support for many different scripts and users, not just ASP script.
I don't have enough time to browse each possible forum to find threads about Nuevolab product.

I already mentioned that Nuevolab login rules has changed recently and now it requires to provide email instead of username.
If you do not remember password you can recover it.
If you do not remember email you registered with there's only Nuevolab's "contact" form left to get help.

Note that Nuevolab system now requires email as login not username.
Unfortunatel I do not know you username or email so I could check it.

Embedded videos are not played by Nuevoplayer so it's not a question related to Nuevoplayer.
Embedded videos are what embed code is. The player is what some website service offers that you embedded player from. If it's some flash player, it won't play on mobile devices. Only few services offer iframe code with HTMl5 alternative playback.

In opposite, if you embed Nuevoplayer from own website, playing own video on any other site it will play both, desktop and html5, if you only have mp4/h264 videos for mobile playback. Our embed code for Adul Script is not limited to flash only. Additionally using some modification such embedded player can show ads from some ad networks or using AnyAd plugin by Nuevolab.

Ofcourse it won't play in Opera. On html5 you have browsers and formats they support.
This is not something that depends of player.
There is no such magic option that same video file will play on every browser.
And it's easy to  find that most video services still use flash when it's only possible.
That's why default Nuevoplayer playback is flash. If flash not detected Nuevoplayer automatically searches for html5 video tag support.
It is even posssible to define many alternative video formats, including webm and ogg and Nuevoplayer will choose the right one,
but video files is is not what we sell or offer to encode and store. Of course this is user's case, sevrer and choice.

I do also use only mp4/h264 for both: desktop and mobile device, even if I have working webm conversion option on my private conversion class.  I agree it's cheapest solution now.

For ASP script I must adopt my code to what ASP script is.
And so default playback is flash, plays either flv or mp4 video on desktop + mp4 from mobile directory on mobile devices. Just what ASP scripts and user's videos are.
On my small demo site, which is only demo that I don't care as normal website I use only h264/mp4 format.
So it plays flash on desktops and html5 on browsers that do not support flash.

I think that mobile device browsers will keep h264/mp4 support.
There is too much other devices (eg. tousands of cameras and mobile devices) using this format, too much companies use such format for their commercial products.

On your website you have "Flash only" type of player, so it can't play html5.
From Nuevoplayer 6 or 7 there is option to set player type in admin.

It's not correct. Still URL without "www" is accessible. Why don't you check URL?
Or maybe this is missunderstanding abotu websie> I write about pornboro site.
If it's not yours then diregard my message. This is other client's trouble then.
xpornclub doesn't even use custom html5 player, it use mobile template with direct mp4 link.

Video is playing in html5 browsers on your site, Mr Eri. It's playing also on my real iPad device I luckilly have. Maybe only streaming is bit slow, but it's server and location case, not a player. There's nothing wrong with player, Eri.
If you can't watch it, the only possible reason is that you try to access your website on iPad without "www" prefix.
Javascript and also search engines are very restrictive about "www" prefix. They treat websites with and without "www" as 2 different sites. In case of javascript it throws Same Origin Policy error when player comes from one url and configuration file from other.
Website address based on ASP script is defined for one website URL, later used as BASE_URL global variable.
If such global variable is set with "www", also website should be accessible only with "www".

This is basic webmaster knowledge from years to know and to apply code to have website accessible from one URL schema only (with or without "www"), never from both.

There are thousands of examples on internet how to redirect website without "www" to one with "www" and opposite. This is absolute must for today. Don't forget that also search engines may treat your site as 2 different websites and find it as one big duplicate if it is accessible as 2 different UR schema.
So it's important not only for player, but also for other even more important things.
Your site pornboro is accessible both with and without "www". This is bad! Really bad.

This is also request to Symtab, to prepare his script in the future, so website with his script was accessible only as one possible general URL, just like defined for BASE_URL global variable.

BTW.
In upcoming version 8 of Nuevoplayer it will be not possible to access Nuevoplayer configuration php file. This will be restricted for anyone who wish to preview file and find all Nuevoplayer settings including video paths. HTMl5 player will be 10 times better.

1.
VEsception provided by  hyggelig is not error in fact, but simple PHP notice.
ASP error display system is pretty confusing, in my opinion (sorry Adrian) and it looks terrible, breaking all HTML. I don't see a good reason to use it.
Luckilly you can always switch to standard PHP error display in admin and nasty ASP err window like provided above will be gone.

2.
Reagrding midroll issue or any other, I'm really bored af asking every user to provide URL with issue.
If you do not provide it, such email is just nonsense fro me. There is nothing to reply if I can't see nothing.
Please take seriously note on Nuevolab.com.  "Each email or ticket without site URL (with issue) can be ignored".
We have a lot of support emails everyday, and when we must choose, we choose those with enough details provided, so we could reply in useful way.

Most important rule for AdBlockers is to search for string "ad" within html output code.
If this is some external ad from some ad network you have no chance to alter such code and change names.

I remember this when I was developing AnyAd plugin for Nuevoplayer.
If someone's really cautious should notice that there is no "ad" string in any part of html output or javascript source name in my plugin.
For example once I used "anyad.js" for javascript src. This was blocked. So I changed it to "anyhtm.js".
But I also had to replace any "ad" accourance inside javascript and html code.

So if I want to advertise using some banner picture only and advertiser id, and avoid "ad" in banner code ad blocker will not block it.
Unfortunately most of ad networks use widely "ad" chars chain in their code and this will be blocked.

So Symtab I suggest you not to use anything with "ad" chars chain in your script code.
Not even for div id or name where ad is supposed to display on template.
This may not stop Adblockers from blocking extrenal ad source, but at least you will have "clean" hands.

Mr xpornclub,
Always, I repeat ALWAYS this is end user problem if we cannot help him.
Either he doesn't understand how his script works, or his script doesn't work as expected.
And this is is what also concerns this specific user.
   
I can't see his files, but certainly it's not something that it should be.
Either he doesn't have single mobile video file, or it is not accessible.
Default ASP script function to extract mobile URL doesn't return any URL, so there is nothing to play.
Even his mobile template doesn't play single video, all clicks on video thumb only redirects to some porn services, doesn't play any video.
On his other website situation is same. ASP stream helper function doesn't return any mobile video URL.
Nuevoplayer (and any other player) is based on what ASP script delivers and nothing else.
If it doesn't show mobile video URL, there is nothing to play.

Unfortunately the user is not able to check it, doesn't imagine how his script works.
But he does know very well one word "fuck".
So what reply can be to his inquiries? It can be only one :  NULL
Well, indeed it's hard to imagine any cooperation with such people. It is simply not possible.
I cannot spend my time on writing tons of long emails with details that user completely doesn't understand.
I am happy to cooperate with reasonable and kind people who understand a little bit of how websites work or are willing to learn it.
I am also ready to look at some issues on server if user deliver his FTP access and it doesn't concern completely cusstom solutions,
but this doesn't mean that everything will work as user except, as it can be related to what his server and script options are.
For eaxmple it's really naive to expect html5 playback if videos for mobile do not exist or server restricts access to it.

Mr xpornclub, on your website it was possible to use Nuevoplayer in the way you have it because,

1. You have mobile template off
2. Player type option is set and read by script properly
3. You have mobile videos in mobile directory that URL is properly extracted by ASP script.

But user DuttyRock doesn't meet any of these criteria and expects miracles.
But I am not magician. I am also not the one who will accept his vulgar and offensive language.

What for such code?
Nuevoplayer is integrated with AdultScript and code is set automatically.
Type of code (flash or javascript) depends of what type of player user select in player settings.
If javascript type selected (flash +html5) it automatically switches to desired playback depending on device.

Code quoted form website is generic code,
it doesn't make use of many advanced settings available in AdultScript player integration.
For supported scripts like AdultScriptPro player setup is much more simplified and automatic, but final result much more advanced.

Overall, there is mobile template to play videos on mobile devices. None player is needed for it.

Regarding responsive theme, some time ago I started to build one for AdultScriptPro, pretty nice.
But I'm wondering if this has sense to finish it at the moment according to your future plans as discussed.