The forum is here for legacy reasons. No new posts will be created. User registration is disabled! If you have any questions, please email us or check https://www.adultscriptpro.com for more details!
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Yes, the translation of "Porn video category" would be ok as long as I could leave it empty and not have any text there...
I know that removing ALT tags unfortunately breaks validation but keep in mind that Google itself has said that validation is not a ranking factor.
Just to prove what I just said:
Google.com doesn't validate, and not worried about it .http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.2
SeoMoz guys don't care: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% … ator%2F1.2
and the New York Times neither: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% … ator%2F1.2
Most my sites don't validate and I couldn't care less but I understand it's hard to convince scripts potential buyers that validation isn't worth it.
Hi,
yes... another thing that worries me it's the "title" tag in links (only visible in code).
For example the "title" tag for links in the category page is *category name* Porn Video Category. "Porn Video Category" is hardcoded in categories.tpl.php
This can lead to 2 problems:
1. If my site is not in english, the sentence in the title will not add value to my SEO... why mix 2 languages?
2. This might be a bigger problem. Porn website are known for having very little textual content (mainly videos and photos). All sites made with ASP are porn websites so we can assume many categories will be named the same (amateur, anal, etc). Let's say in a year you'll have sold 1 million copies of ASP - let's hope - there will be a million websites with few content and very similar code.
Remember that the link title tag is considered content (not code) by search engines. In fact the link title tag is also used for accessiblity for blind users. This means that a million website will have mostly identical pages... for example the CATEGORIES page: few text, identical categories, identical urls, identical title tags (Porn Video Category will be in every site). Also "Porn Video Category" will be repeated for each category, if you have 40 categories, 40 repetitions... search engines might interpret that like an over-optimization attempt.
While this is not an incredibly bad thing, I'm pretty sure it's not a good thing and not definitely not a good "quality" signal.
So we could eliminate "Porn Video Category" in the title tags and leave the category name only. But this leads to another issue: the title attribute in links should be used to give ADDITIONAL info to links. Why repeat the same info then?
I would eliminate the link title attribute for all these links (thats what I'll do on my sites), EXCEPT for the ones in the menus since they're customizable and the link title attribute will be uinque AND different to the menu name, example: Link Text: "Models" Link Title: "Browse our Porn Actresses Database". <--Good title attribute
The exact same reasoning should be used for the Title attributes ALT attributes for videos links in categories pages.
Example: the video "Sasha Grey Lesbian Experience" will have:
Anchor Text: Sasha Grey Lesbian Experience
Link title attribute: Sasha Grey Lesbian Experience
Image alt attribiute: Sasha Grey Lesbian Experience
URL: /121/sasha-grey-lesbian-experience
That really looks as an over-optimization attempt to me. URL and anchor text is fine but in my experience if you don't have a real "alternative" text for the other attributes it's better to not use them at all. I'm not suggesting to have additional inputs fields for these attributes like for metas, it would be overly complicated and also unrealistic to have to edit them for each video. On my sites I will just eliminate the title and Alt attributes for these links.
Generally speaking in seo terms, if something is not adding anything relevant to the content and it's just a repetition, it won't bring SEO value to the site. Doing it will increase the risk of mediocre rankings or over-optimization penalties.
Sorry for being long, I thought it was better to describe why I would do certain things than just saying what to do.
Thanks for your time.
Hi,
thanks for the reply.
Headings:
the most important thing whould be using H1 for the page title, so for video page H1 would contain the video title, for category pages the category name, for the models page the model name. Currently they're in H4.
Applying H2,H3,H4 in a video site isn't easy because the content is mainly videos, not text. Good thing is that you can avoid to used them, it's not necessary.
The model pages have more text so for example, for Sasha Grey's page: H1 for "Sasha Grey", H2 for "Sasha Grey Description" (not the description text itself) and H3 for "Sasha Grey Biography". You could also use H2 for both "Sasha Grey Description" and "Sasha Grey Biography" if you think the content is equally important.
Meta:
Yes, having custom field for metas for each page would be great. BUT PLEASE, leave the current automated system in place if those fields are left empty otherwise a webmaster would be forced to edit thousands of entries.
For example on my site I want personalized meta desc and title for category pages but automated metas for the videos. Having to manually edit 10.000 videos would force me not to use the script.
Didn't think about multi-language sites... ideally yes, it would require an admin multi language system. Maybe it will be a little complex but I think a webmaster that can handle a "real" multi-langua site can handle that.
Also I think you forgot to add "day-days" to the language files. Years, minutes, hours, seconds are there but couldn't find day/days.
The word "Watch" is hardcoded in view.php and goes in every video meta description. I think it should be editable in the language files since "Watch" is only used in english.
I'm a professional SEO, here's some advice for future features:
1. Meta descriptions: there are many reasons why a webmaster could want a different meta description for and individual page instead of the one that is automatically built right now (even if that's editable). Add a field in the video edit and category edit pages in control panel to add a unique meta description. If the field is left empty, the regular method will be used.
Same thing for the "browser" title but only for categories. I may want to name a category "Amateur" but use a more complex broswer title.
2. Meta keywords: get rid of them. They're not used by search engines to rank websites anymore BUT they can be used to penalize them. They do more harm than good.
3. Avoid use of Headings (H2,H3,H4) for css styling or for the website logo. Headings should always containg information that is strictly related to the individual page content. Also they should be in sequence, if there's no H1, there shouldn't be an H2, H3 and so on. Example: category pages have no H1 while it should contain the category name, H2 is used for the logo while it shouldn't, there is no H3 and H4 is used for the category name.
I don't mean to sound too critic, best script I've tested so far, my 2 cents.
Pages: 1