Adult Script Pro Community Forums

The forum is here for legacy reasons. No new posts will be created. User registration is disabled! If you have any questions, please email us or check https://www.adultscriptpro.com for more details!

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Open Discussion » As the only woman here that's talking... » 2012-03-18 15:36:48

What a pleasant surprise to login today and see a post like this :-)
You look super HOT ;-)

I am starting to like NY. after seeing this - hehe...

#2 Re: Open Discussion » forum feature » 2012-03-11 20:47:06

Ahh sorry i misunderstood...
I thought you meant in general (on your own site) :-)

I Agree - A pm system here would be nice so it wont have to send directly to your mail.

#3 Re: Pre-sale questions » video chat » 2012-03-11 07:22:39

You dont expect them to publish names on companies, when you see they didnt agree on anything final yet.
Let them do their negotiations, and then we will know, if it becomes an option.

jaydenblair@live.co.uk wrote:

What video chat company was it?

#4 Re: Open Discussion » Tube site's » 2012-03-11 07:19:25

My opinion, those things does not belong together.
If you have dating together with a Tube site, you dont have to use much imagination to figure out the seriousity level of that dating feature.
Make a "hook-up" site and connect it via a main link instead. That way, your Hook-up site also invites to others, who are not using the Tube site.

If you want your members to hook up like you mention. Make a forum category for hook-ups.

#5 Re: Open Discussion » forum feature » 2012-03-11 07:14:42

Use Comet chat for that.... it's cheap, easy to integrate, and does not really require any server capacity.

#6 Re: Open Discussion » All in One SEO Pack » 2012-03-07 11:50:31

Hyggelig.
Der findes ikke rigtig nogle "nemme" løsninger på søgeords optimering, hvis det skal have nogen effelt.
Hvis du vælger nogle at de færdige løsninger som findes på nettet, så pas godt på hvad det indebærer. Og specielt pas på udbydere fra lande som Kina, Indien osv. da 90% af den er fuskere og ikke på noget tidspunkt har planer om at hjælpe din side.
Jeg ved ikke hvor meget du kender til SEO men søg lidt på nettet, vær super kritisk og hop ikke på den første og bedste løsning du finder.
Men spørg endelig hvis der er noget jeg kan hjælpe med (er dog ikke selv noget ekspert på det område)..
Held og lykke med det.

hyggelig wrote:

how du i inprent All in One SEO Pack into the site

#7 Re: Feature Requests » Pornstar section » 2012-03-07 11:43:43

Thanks symtab...
Glad you know what i mean :-)

#8 Re: Open Discussion » All in One SEO Pack » 2012-03-07 07:33:08

Just a little "input" on the backlinks.
Backlinks has almost NO effect, unless its from quality sites with good ranking.
There is no advantage in having 2000 backlinks from "unranked or low ranked sites. Actually, the risk of getting "banned" is higher than the advantage of those backlinks.
Have in mind - Google (yeah, mainly Google) punish sites if they have backlinks to link-farms and other bad link-sites. And once your blacklisted by Google, you have a long way back to being listed.
So use backlinks, if it's quality links, otherwise, stay away from it.

Buying 1000 backlinks for a few $ via freelancer or other places where you find those sales is NOT recommended.
From bitter experience, i did that once, and my former site went from Pagerank 3 down to being without ranking, in one day, and never came back to any ranking. Not because of the site content, but simple because of the backlinks i bought.

So use backlinks as suggested, but think before you do it, but dont think Google are stupid...
Build your backlinks little by little. Don't overdo it within a few days, unless you really wish for your site to be blacklisted on rankings.

Other than that, i totally agree with symtab. The quality of the code is very important.
Title tags etc are very important, but Meta is not that important anymore (as it was before) but no harm of structure your site after all.

The best way to build backlinks (in my opinion) is to write serious forum posts and blogs on quality sites, (PR3 or higher), but it needs to be quality posts. Otherwise the effect is very little.

There is no easy and fast solution to real SEO work. Its time consuming and difficult. But if you know how to do it, it's worth it all.

#9 Re: Feature Requests » Pornstar section » 2012-03-07 07:18:20

Yeah I know it has crop tool and that you can move the fixed size around, but thats not what i requested (please read the request again).
I requested a "normal" crop tool, so I decide how much of the picture i want cropped, and not just a fixed size 3:4.
Depending of the size of photo you upload, you just dont have this existing crop-tool doing it's work very flexible..

#10 Re: Feature Requests » Pornstar section » 2012-03-06 11:55:03

Btw - The Crop tool could also be flexible (in Pornstars), as long as it keeps the 3:4 proportions. But it would be preferred to have an option to drag and crop the photos as preferred instead of a fixed area/size...

#11 Re: Feature Requests » Pornstar section » 2012-03-06 08:02:41

Sounds good - Thanks for the feedback.

#12 Feature Requests » Pornstar section » 2012-03-06 06:42:26

Sleepwalker
Replies: 8

• Missing the option for simple html to make line breaks, bold and underlined text etc in the pornstar description.
As it is now, its all just one long text, with the result that its harder to read, and looks messy.
html works fine in the links for the pornstars, just not the description.

• A url rewrite would also be great, since some sites will use the module for Models and not Pornstars, and for now, i got a few "VERY" offended models who doesn't like the url for our "Model" section :-)

Thanks...

#13 Re: Marketplace » TruFlix.com is for sale » 2012-03-04 21:40:29

Jimmy > I am also a little curios about your expectations to a sale, and the setup for it...
As you said yourself -
Revenue - Nothing worth mentioning, few bucks from juicy ads and a few affiliate sales.

What if a buyer have his own server? are you locked on a server deal that needs to be included in the sale?

Just saying > Dont expect much more than the price of the license... The site makes no profit, so why pay more?
As "dirty angel" also said. It's all about profit - and life sucks... If you aren't able to show a profit, better expect all the hours you invested as "lost" and be happy if you can get a full price for the license back.

Anyway - try to post a price here, and lets see if any of us are interested - its a lot better and more serious that way.

#14 Re: Open Discussion » Learning photo editing » 2012-03-03 08:43:04

I will remove them again :-)

Try to describe, explain or to draw by hand and then scan it... :-) It will make it easier (if possible)

#16 Re: Open Discussion » Best Payment Processor » 2012-02-29 17:24:27

OK, then your up against the 12-15% fees from the others...
But depending on your country rules, it's possible to register as a sole business on Paypal, without writing your VAT and business number, so depending on India, it might be an option after all.
Try to set up a Paypal business account and see if it gets approved... At least thats free to try...

#17 Re: Open Discussion » Best Payment Processor » 2012-02-29 17:18:11

Paypal has a category called: Entertainment & Media >> Subcategory: Adult Digital content...

I would call that a pretty suitable category for adult digital content :-)
But of course you have to register as business and not as private person...

#18 Re: Open Discussion » Best Payment Processor » 2012-02-29 16:26:48

Out of those, Paypal is absolutely the cheapest. But it depends on where your members are from.
Is it American, i would guess CCBill is best or most recognized, but cost around 12-15% in fees, if I remember right. So way too much for that service.
Paypal accept most credit card and also bank transfers, so if your members don't mind, it will be the best solution for you...

Regarding the Premium content
To me it sounds like an idea that will bring very few paying members (i mean, if you expect to get free content, and sell that).
Members are using a lot of sites, and unless your content in the Premium section is unique, then you wont get many members to pay for something they can find on other sites for free...
Premium content is (in my opinion) if you make your own photo shoots and videos (or have others to do it for you)... Then it makes sense to sell it. Otherwise its a very unethical thing to do (my opinion)...
Always use yourself as example. Would you pay for something that is not unique and maybe even available for free some other place. I know i wouldn't...

Find a Niche - make some photo sessions yourself, or get it done by others.
Then you can sell it, and feel good about it at the same time.
Your from India. Why not make some sessions of some pretty Indian girls with a theme (uniform, police, or anything else) and use that. I am sure you can get a session for $100-300 (depending on the girls and how you treat them) - but, It cost money to make money, at least if your serious. And yes, it will take many sessions before you can open a Premium area with own content. Its all about how much you can and will invest...

Good luck on it...

#19 Re: Open Discussion » Changing logo » 2012-02-27 12:26:01

Rude??? Well, yes, if you dont have a sense of humor, then you might see it as rude.
I still dont see the boobs he mentioned. And I was trying to say that i Didnt see it as a game because of the games he mentioned, simply because i dont know the game (or any other games)... Is that rude???
Well if it is, then I am a rude person...
Never mind... It's your site and your logo, so whatever you think it good, then go for it - visible or not visible boobs...

jaydenblair@live.co.uk wrote:

Thanks @ful2fun.com, But I dont mind if its bad or good feedback at the end of the day its feedback and its only a graphic so it can be changed very easy.

Also @sleepwalker i think you are being very rude to shadow...
"Btw: How do you see those boobs on the Angel when others cant? Do they hand out superman glasses in that game you mentioned?"

#20 Re: Open Discussion » Changing logo » 2012-02-26 21:32:28

I am not thinking games like Cod-Battlefield or whatever the name was... Dont even know it (sorry) - I dont play games at all :-) But it was the "impression" the logo left, even to a non-gamer as me.
Btw: How do you see those boobs on the Angel when others cant? Do they hand out superman glasses in that game you mentioned?  big_smile

Shadow wrote:

I think the green glow looks good. Something you would often see coming out of a crypt in a cemetery. The green eerie glow of death.
Your thinking games, due to the lot of games now using green lasers and smoke. (Cod-Battlefield, etc)
I don't really think the angel looks young. She's got boobs. But you can't really see it due to the text being in front of it.

#21 Re: Open Discussion » Changing logo » 2012-02-26 05:06:42

Well since you "dare" to ask, I feel free to comment on it... Does the "artist" know it's for an adult site?

It is Way too much "Gamer style" if you know what i mean. The green "outer glow", does not relate to adult sites, but to the category "fantasy/games". I would guess you are or were a Gamer before, at least the style reflects that...
I also agree with ERI - the Angel looks underage (if you knew it was for an adult site) but actually it does not make anyone think of an adult site at all.
If I didnt see the logo in this forum, i would be 100% sure the logo was for a game.

No offense - But since you dare to ask, I expect you are ready to hear others opinion as well...

Cleaner style preferred - and then let the content of the site do the "talking" (in my opinion)...

#22 Re: Show Off » Pornogoddess.com » 2012-02-22 23:28:53

Looks ok, but if you want a little personal opinion, its too red-in-red in the top of the site.
Having a red background for a red logo makes your logo disappear which is a shame. Of course depending on the style you look for, so it was just my personal opinion...
Same at footer bar - style "cracks" a little when you have white text in the same line as red links...
Same style/colors etc would lift it a little, but other than that, it looks nice...

#23 Re: Feature Requests » Module For Cam Site Affiliation » 2012-02-22 23:21:52

There will be a new company (pretty soon) where you can use both affiliate or white-label setup, and with a way better solution than the overexposed and greedy companies that are on the market now.
I talked to one of the owners about a week ago, and they will update me when more info is available.
If anyone have interest in this, let me know, and I will send you an update when i have more news.

I had access to a test site, and it's a huge difference in both quality and setup/usability (for the better) compared to the sites and solutions i have seen other places. And it's super easy to use for both performers and visitors, so I can only assume that this site will become very popular in short time.
And for site owners as us, they have a very interesting affiliate setup so it will increase the interest for the site and help promote it via affiliates.

Send me a pm and let me know if you want more info when i get some updates...

#24 Re: Open Discussion » dating site » 2012-02-22 18:50:33

If you didnt pay for it yet, Please re-think...
We tested the software some months ago, and its FULL of bugs.
All the good ratings you see around the net, are made by the company themselves and not by real members.
Trust me - we spent a month checking the script, and finally the company gave up for all our bug reports, and returned our money, and asked us to please find another script - LOL.
The support is good thou (no complaints on that part) - but its no help when the script is full of bugs.
It seems like a nice script, (fast and easy to use) but its far from ready to be used because of all the bugs.

If you have the server-power for it, then go for Skadate.
Their script is heavy compared to others, but it is way more flexible, serious and reliable, with a very active forum, who are willing to help you a lot.

If your into vldpersonals it is also a light script, and a lot better than emeeting.
vldpersonals also offer you a Free to try option...

Check those other two alternatives before you go for emeeting...

Good luck

jaydenblair@live.co.uk wrote:

im using emeeting and the site is up buyt not ready yet im having some stuff made by web designers datefreedirect.com

#25 Re: Open Discussion » WTF...I hate these spammers » 2012-02-22 18:24:01

I dont know if you have the options to do following, but I am also running a social network site (beside your script), and in that network, we stopped spamming but making 2 different membership levels.
We made a simple setup like "new members and Verified members" and the settings are set as:

New members, need manual approval for posts in forum (and blogs in our case).
For every picture, video or forum post a member post, they earn (x) points.

When a member has earned (xx) points, they are automatically upgraded to Verified membership.
When your upgraded to Verified member, you no longer have to wait for approval on your posts.

It might be a few minutes work a day, to verify and check things, but 99,9% of the spammers give up, cause it takes too much time and work from their side, and they move on to next forum to annoy them instead :-)

So, its an easy way to get rid of most spammers, and make your site seem more serious...

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB